🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to resume nuclear discussions with the United States as long as it is treated with "dignity" and "respect", Iran's foreign minister has announced.

The Iranian diplomat stated only diplomacy worked, and revealed recent overtures had been made by mediators to restart discussions with the American leadership. He asserted Iran did not have undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the global atomic watchdog to access struck enrichment centers for safety concerns.

Navigating a Challenging Path

Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a position of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had arisen stronger in military terms and mentally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was speaking at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium within its borders that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the earlier negotiations.

Prior Negotiations Suddenly Terminated

The prior phases of negotiations between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and acrimonious termination on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, targeted Iranian nuclear sites in a 12-day war that concluded with the US president declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Subsequently, European countries used their authority to reinstate international penalties, but Iran asserts they have not had a major impact.

Perfect Agreement Suggested

Tehran representatives said they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in prior discussions, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to assert triumph since home-based processing would have persisted and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was entirely non-military.

It had not been decided in the discussions that American atomic experts could operate within Iranian territory, but that was a natural consequence of the cooperative offer. Officials asserted repeatedly they had reached agreement with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the agreement to collapse due to "opponents in the US".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the suggestion could be revived in some form if negotiations resume.

The American leader last week claimed he had been obtaining communications that Iran wanted to resume discussions, but privately Iran's diplomats claim they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the face of Washington's unmediated tactics, but Tehran asserts negotiations is not part of a show.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the gathering, intended to portray the US as a dominant force that exploits the idea of international law, Araghchi stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the clash could not be resolved by military means. He said the assaults commenced with a US demand for an total Iran submission and culminated with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and collaboration, making confidence difficult to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Ultimate Resolution

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the Western nations that had consistently attempted to dictate their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and continues the primary solution to resolve disagreements, but its standards, guidelines and principles must be respected."

"If they address to the nation of Iran with the approach of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the identical approach."

Recovery and Reconstruction

In what is described by Iran's diplomats as the conflict of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's defence capabilities "are considerably enhanced than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We gained numerous insights from this engagement; we have identified our own weaknesses and the shortcomings of the opponent."

He added: "We successfully passed this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, remains in place. The installations and gear, if damaged, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the resolve of the nation of Iran and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but failed to break. The citizens of Tehran have become more powerful, more united, and more backing of the administration and the nation in the aftermath of this attack."